Database Links
Synopses
RIGHT TO REPLY: RIGHT TO REPLY[2000/03/17]
NFA Catalogue
v. Nick Moore thinks the latest series of THE 11 O'CLOCK SHOW (C4) is blatantly homophobic. comment from James Rampton (TV Critic, The Independent), reply from Andrew Newman (Deputy Commissioning Editor, Comedy & Entertainment, Channel 4). Internet survey group, Right to Reply 500 were asked if: Topical satire must run the risk of causing offence.. 85% said 'yes' 15% said 'no' Enough material [for a topical satirical programme on three times a week] 53% said 'yes, 47% said 'no' v. Gerard McGrath feels RATRAP (ITV) crossed ethical boundaries by laying bait for potential criminals. This is not only entrapment but may also encourage new crimes. comment from Neil O'May (Head of Criminal Law, Bindman & Partners). Followed by studio discussion with Sarah Caplin (Executive Producer, Ratrap). GM and RB. v. Christa Friend wants to know why Channel Four scheduled a late night edition of HOLLYOAKS featuring adult storylines? Younger fans have been excluded by the soap stepping out of its regular slot. reply Jo Hallows (Series Producer, 'Hollyoaks'). Report on the ITN's libel victory against LM Magazine. v. Harry Beekman finds recording with PDC (Programme Delivery Control) unreliable. comments from Sanjay De (Marketing Manager, Video Equipment, Philips), Michael Gleave (Technical Director, BBC).